MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
British Journal of Urology
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

821 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
821 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 10 of 17

Labels cover 0 of 821 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 821 of 821 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Intermittent androgen suppression
M. Pether, S. Larry Goldenberg
2004· review· fr· British Journal of Urology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Protein kinase C‐α in prostate cancer
Michael Lahn, Kristina Sundell, Martin Gleave, Chunxia Su, S. Li, Ding Ma +2 more
2004· review· en· British Journal of Urology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
afffundunlabeled
Information needs of men on androgen deprivation therapy
Tony Soeyonggo, Padraig Warde, Neil Fleshner, Narhari Timilshina, Shabbir M.H. Alibhai
2011· article· en· British Journal of Urology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
Prostate cancer immunology – an update for Urologists
Nieroshan Rajarubendra, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Damien Bolton, Laurence Klotz, Ian D. Davis
2010· review· en· British Journal of Urology· Immunology and Microbiology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Robotics in urology
Prokar Dasgupta, Ben Challacombe
2004· article· en· British Journal of Urology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
The prognostic value of <scp>lymph node</scp> staging with prostate‐specific membrane antigen ( <scp>PSMA)</scp> positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/ <scp>CT)</scp> and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in <scp>node‐positive</scp> patients with prostate cancer
Dennie Meijer, Rosemarijn H. Ettema, Pim J. van Leeuwen, Theodorus van der Kwast, Henk G. van der Poel, Maarten L. Donswijk +3 more
2022· article· en· British Journal of Urology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About