The tensile properties of tension‐free vaginal tape and cadaveric fascia lata in an <i>in vivo</i> rat model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the tensile properties (break load and maximum average load), after in vivo implantation in a rat animal model, of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and cadaveric fascia lata (CFL), as pubovaginal slings of these materials have become popular for treating stress urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty Sprague-Dawley rats (300-400 g) had 1 x 2 cm strips of commercially available TVT and CFL implanted on the right and left anterior abdominal wall, respectively. Half of the animals were then killed at 6 weeks and the remainder at 12 weeks, after which the strips of TVT and CFL were removed and their tensile properties measured using a tensiometer. The tensile strength of TVT and CFL strips maintained only in normal saline served as controls. RESULTS: The TVT strips had a mean break load of 0.740 kg in the control and only 0.390 kg for CFL (P < 0.05). At 6 weeks the TVT material had a mean (sd) maximum average load of 0.634 (0.096) kg and a mean break load of 0.589 (0.249) kg, whereas the respective values for the CFL were 0.323 (0.198) and 0.167 (0.063) kg (P < 0.05). Similarly at 12 weeks, TVT had a greater mean maximum average and break load than CFL, at 0.742 (0.052) and 0.274 (0.126), and 0.737 (0.056) and 0.185 (0.128) kg, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to assess the tensile properties of the currently used sling materials, TVT and CFL, in an in vivo model. TVT has a greater break load and maximum average load than CFL; the tensile strength of these materials does not decrease with time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".