MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,460 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,460 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 11 of 70

Labels cover 6 of 3,460 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,460 of 3,460 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Deciphering the Genome of Constitutionalism
Ran Hirschl, Gary J. Jacobsohn, Howard Schweber, Monika Polzin, Jaclyn L. Neo, Stephen Gardbaum +13 more
2024· book· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
THE PARADOXES OF PRO BONO
Richard Abel
2010· article· en· Fordham law review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Introduction: The New Puritan Studies
Bryce Traister
2017· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Religious Thought In The Last Quarter Century
Gerald Birney Smith, J. M. Powis Smith
2007· book· en· Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
United States Colored Troops
Holly A. Pinheiro
2022· reference-entry· en· Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Structures of Discrimination
Rebecca J. Cook
2011· article· en· HIMALAYA· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affvenueunlabeled
From Author's Right to Property Right
Simon Stern
2012· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Bentham and the Death Penalty
Brian Calvert
2006· article· en· Dialogue· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About