MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Military and Defense Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

605 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
605 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 11 of 13

Labels cover 0 of 605 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 605 of 605 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The Salvation Army - a study in compliance
Peter Letkemann
2011· article· en· cIRcle (University of British Columbia)· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Armed Forces Covenant : Northamptonshire Evaluation
Richard Hazenberg, Toa Giroletti
2019· article· en· NECTAR - Northampton Electronic Collection of Thesis and Research (University of Northampton)· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
0. List of Contents
Anessa L. Kimball
2018· dataset· en· Harvard Dataverse· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Canadian Defence and Securiry Policy: Recent Literature
Peter Stoett
2000· article· en· International journal of Canadian studies = Revue internationale d'études canadiennes· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Cavinula variostriata Mann
2014· article· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Canadian Special Operations
Commodore Eric Lerhe
2005· article· en· Journal of military and strategic studies· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Viking Force: Canada’s Unknown Commandos
George L. Kerr
2000· article· en· Canadian military history· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Foreword
2023· book-chapter· en· McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+stsconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Canada without Armed Forces
Paul Robinson
2006· article· en· British Journal of Canadian Studies· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
6 The Montreal Games
2008· book-chapter· en· Harvard University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Appendix 10: NATO Threat Assessment, April 1983
Nigel West
2021· book-chapter· en· Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Canadian Military Law Annotated
M.W. Drapeau
2007· article· en· The Military Law and the Law of War Review· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · sts
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Foreword
2018· book-chapter· en· University of British Columbia Press eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Executive Agreements Database, Statement Regarding Amendment Two to the Agreement Between The United States and Canada Concerning the Exchange Of Defence Professional Personnel Signed At Arlington and Ottawa October 2, 2002, and January 9, 2003 Entered Into Force January 9, 2003 Effective From October 2, 2002
Oona A. Hathaway, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith
2003· dataset· en· Harvard Dataverse· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About