Strategic Human Resources Management Practices in the Private Security Industry: Workforce Retention and Professional Development A Case Study of Securitas Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study researches strategic human resources management (SHRM) practices in Canada's private security industry.It examines the role SHRM plays in workforce retention and staff professional development programs at Securitas Canada.Furthermore, the study investigates how Securitas applied SHRM principles to reduce its high staff turnover rate, and enhance the skill development of its workforce in a labor-intensive and high-risk industry.Using a mixed method of semi-structured approach, which comprises interviews with stakeholders, surveys with 300 employees, and document analysis, the study provides a robust insight into the company's HR strategies.The findings show that competitive compensation packages, targeted recognition programs, and sound professional development initiative have pushed its turnover rate far below the industry average.In addition, technology-driven training and leadership programs put in place by the company has strengthened the HR practices of the organization.The study expands SHRM literature by utilizing the High-Performance Work Systems (HPWS) and Ability Motivation Opportunity (AMO) frameworks to a largely under-researched sector.The study would guide private security firms in improving workforce stability and career growth in high-risk operational occupation and environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".