MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

714 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
714 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 11 of 15

Labels cover 6 of 714 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 714 of 714 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Skin integrity—the perpetual challenge
Peter Bradley
2020· article· en· Journal of Wound Care· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Surgical Options for Advanced Pressure Injuries
A. Bert Chabot, Shafic Abdulkarim, Samantha D. Morin, Ibrahim T Yazgan, Abigail E. Chaffin
2025· article· en· Advances in Skin & Wound Care· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s1526-4114(06)60140-6
Jacqueline Vance
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
1
citations
affunlabeled
Living in a World Without Closure
Maureen Heaman
2007· article· en· MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Pressure Injury and Pressure Ulcers
Robyn Evans, Carol Ott, Madhuri Reddy
2016· other· en· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Assessment and Management of Pressure Injuries
Kathy Kump, Chenel Trevellini
2020· article· en· Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Is wound care provision equitable
Jacqui Fletcher, Karen Ousey
2013· article· en· Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield)· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Human factors evaluation of an innovative wound care technology
Anna Bradford, Kathryn Arnold, Katherine VanTil, Jill de Grood, Kathryn A. Ambler, Patty Wickson +1 more
2025· article· en· Human Factors in Healthcare· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
In response
Kevin Woo, Lei Huang, Li-Bao Liu, Ruijuan Wen, Ailing Hu, Chenggang Shi
2016· article· en· Advances in Skin & Wound Care· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About