MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,836 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,836 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 13 of 37

Labels cover 4 of 1,836 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,836 of 1,836 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
A Data-Adaptive Approach to cDNA Microarray Image Enhancement
Rastislav Lukàč, Konstantinos N. Plataniotis, Bogdan Smołka, A.N. Venetsanopoulos
2005· book-chapter· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Reaping the Benefits of SAGE
Stephen J. Robinson, Justin D. Guenther, Christopher T. Lewis, Matthew G. Links, Isobel A. P. Parkin
2007· article· en· Humana Press eBooks· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Towards Quality Control for DNA Microarrays
Kaleigh Smith
2004· article· en· Journal of Computational Biology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Application of DNA Array Technology for Diagnostic Microbiology
Stephanie A. Booth, Michael Drebot, Graham Tipples, Lai King Ng
2000· article· en· Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Identifying Robust Biomarker Panels for Breast Cancer Screening
Maria L. Vaida, Kamala K. Arumalla, Pavan Kumar Tatikonda, Bharadwaj Popuri, Rashid Bux, Paramjit S. Tappia +3 more
2024· preprint· en· Preprints.org· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About