MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Soybean genetics and cultivation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

977 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
977 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 14 of 20

Labels cover 0 of 977 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 977 of 977 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundaboutno affunlabeled
Sugarbeet Research 2004
Allan S. Hamill
2004· article· en· The Atrium (University of Guelph)· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
OAC Union soybean
Mohsen Yoosefzadeh-Najafabadi, Stirling Bryan, Robert Brandt, Sepideh Torabi, Milad Eskandari
2023· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
Tsuru soybean
V. Poysa, L. Woodrow, K. Yu
2006· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
AAC Big Ben soybean
Kangfu Yu, L. Woodrow, C. H. Shi
2019· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Uniform Soybean Tests Northern Region 2016
Steve Scofield, Brandon J. Schemerhorn, Guohong Cai, Gary L. Nowling
2018· article· en· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
JoVE Video Dataset
Jie Lin, Dasol Wi, Melissa Ly, Md Asraful Jahan, Sarah Pullano, Izabella Martirosyan +1 more
2023· article· pt· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Soybean planting date x maturity group in Kansas
Ignacio A. Ciampitti, Luiz H. Moro Rosso, Emmanuela van Verseendaal, James Kimball, Eric Adee
2022· dataset· en· Figshare· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About