MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2388632306

Gelling Properties and Stability of Egg White Powder

2012· article· en· W2388632306 on OpenAlexaff
Qiang Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo jiaqin · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEgg whiteSolubilityWater holding capacityFood scienceMicrostructureMaterials scienceWater contentMoistureChemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamics on gel texture,water holding capacity and microstructure of egg white powder gels during storage were studied. The results showed that gel hardness,springiness,cohesiveness and water holding capacity of egg white powder gels were 346 g/cm2、0.905,0.382,52.00% respectively,After storage at 25 ℃ for 180 days, gel hardness and cohesiveness had no significant change (P0.05),while gel elasticity and water holding capacity changed obviously (P0.05). The solubility of egg white powder decreased with storage time,but the decline was not significant (P=0.154),A loose network with constant stability in the course of storage was observed in the gel of egg white powder in SEM (500×). The results demonstrated that storage time and temperature have greater influence on gelling properties than those on solubility of egg white powder,moisture content is a key factor to influence the gelling stability of egg white powder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhongguo jiaqinSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207