MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,346 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,346 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 15 of 67

Labels cover 3 of 3,346 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,346 of 3,346 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Faddeev-Popov ghosts in quantum gravity beyond perturbation theory
Astrid Eichhorn
2013· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
50
citations
afffundunlabeled
Shocks in the Early Universe
Ue‐Li Pen, Neil Turok
2016· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
afffundunlabeled
Modified big bang nucleosynthesis with nonstandard neutron sources
A. Coc, Maxim Pospelov, Jean-Philippe Uzan, Elisabeth Vangioni
2014· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
affunlabeled
Spherical collapse in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math>gravity and the Belinskii-Khalatnikov-Lifshitz conjecture
Jun-Qi Guo, Daoyan Wang, Andrei V. Frolov
2014· article· lv· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
48
citations
affunlabeled
Quantum inequalities for the electromagnetic field
Michael J. Pfenning
2001· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
affunlabeled
Cosmological ultraviolet/infrared divergences and de Sitter spacetime
Wei Xue, Keshav Dasgupta, Robert Brandenberger
2011· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
affunlabeled
Electroweak phase transition in nearly conformal technicolor
James M. Cline, Matti Järvinen, Francesco Sannino
2008· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
afffundunlabeled
Gauging the cosmic microwave background
J. P. Zibin, D. Scott
2008· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Search for chameleons with CAST
V. Anastassopoulos, M. Arık, S. Aune, K. Barth, А. С. Белов, H. Bräuninger +58 more
2015· article· en· Physics Letters B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
affunlabeled
Solitons, Instantons, and Twistors
Donald Witt
2011· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
affunlabeled
Measures of gravitational entropy: Self-similar spacetimes
Nicos Pelavas, Kayll Lake
2000· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Testing quantum gravity through dumb holes
Behnam Pourhassan, Mir Faizal, Salvatore Capozzıello
2016· article· en· Annals of Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Baryogenesis from the inflaton field
Mark P. Hertzberg, Johanna Karouby
2014· article· en· Physics Letters B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
affunlabeled
IS MASS QUANTIZED?
Paul S. Wesson
2004· article· en· Modern Physics Letters A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The similarity hypothesis in general relativity
B. J. Carr, A. A. Coley
2005· article· en· General Relativity and Gravitation· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
affunlabeled
Comprehensive analysis of the simplest curvaton model
Christian T. Byrnes, Marina Cortês, Andrew R. Liddle
2014· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
afffundgemma · no categorygpt · no categorymodels agree
Matter conditions for regular black holes in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math>gravity
Joshua Aftergood, Andrew DeBenedictis
2014· article· lv· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
45
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About