MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

823 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
823 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 15 of 17

Labels cover 3 of 823 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 823 of 823 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Care without Judgment?
David J. Roy
2015· editorial· en· Journal of Palliative Care· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
A report of experiences in Toronto
Hiroshi Wakabayashi, Anri Inaki, 大志 若林, 杏吏 稲木
2009· article· ja· Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The Sherbrooke disability prevention model
Philippe Mairiaux
2012· article· fr· ORBi (University of Liège)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Correction to: The Absurd Workplace
P. Matthijs Bal, Andy Brookes, Dieu Hack‐Polay, Maria Kordowicz, John Mendy
2023· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Older Adult's Access to Care in Canada
Charli Abitbol
2025· article· en· Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
maternitylv_20Dec2018.tab
Arijit Nandi, Ilona Vincent, Efe Atabay
2018· dataset· en· Harvard Dataverse· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Care Activism and Communities of Care
Ethel Tungohan
2023· book-chapter· en· University of Illinois Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Co-Design for Improvement in Long-Term Care
Fiona Fick, Chelsea Belt, Kirstian Gibson, Cathy Cole
2025· article· en· International Journal of Integrated Care· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
THE HEALTH PAPERS
2011· article· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About