MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,158 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20102025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,158 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 15 of 44

Labels cover 2 of 2,158 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,158 of 2,158 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
WHAT IS AN ENGINEER: STUDY DESCRIPTION AND CODEBOOOK DEVELOPMENT
Sylvie Doré, Jillian Seniuk Cicek, Marnie Jamieson, Patrick Terriault, Christian Belleau, Renato Rodrigues
2021· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Assessing Process Skills in Engineering Students
Darlene Spracklin-Reid, Susan Caines, Andrew Fisher
2015· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
HOW DO FIRST YEAR STUDENTS FORM THEIR PROJECT TEAMS?
Elizabeth Maggs, Carol Hulls, Chris Rennick, Mary Ann Robinson
2018· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Do Engineering – Anywhere, Anytime
Mark Walters, Erik Luther, Julia Dinolfo
2012· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
A REVIEW OF MINING TECHNOLOGIES FOR SPACE
Hemanth Satish, Peter Radziszewski, Jacques Ouellet
2011· review· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
THE ROLE OF MAKERSPACES IN INCLUSIVITY IN ENGINEERING
Justine Boudreau Boudreau, Hanan Anis
2019· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Pedagogy in a Pandemic: Teaching without Exams
James Andrew Smith
2021· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About