MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Agricultural Economics and Policy
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

878 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
878 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 16 of 18

Labels cover 1 of 878 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 878 of 878 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Ingénue
2023· article· en· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Productivity Growth in U.S. Agriculture: 1948-2013
V. Eldon Ball, Richard F. Nehring, Sun Ling Wang
2016· article· en· International productivity monitor· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
170 Tunney’s Pasture Driveway
2009· article· en· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Bringing Agriculture into the GATT
2007· article· en· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Canadian agricultural s c r
2010· article· en· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Modernising Canada's agricultural policies
2008· book-chapter· en· OECD economic surveys. Canada· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
GRAIN PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION | Overview
Trust Beta
2004· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Why Antidumping Law is Good for Agriculture
Mel Annand
2005· book-chapter· en· University of Calgary Press eBooks· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The cost competitiveness of Alberta dairy farms
Heather-Anne Ruth. Grant
2001· article· en· Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Cryptolestes pusillus
2008· article· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Canada Provides Record Cattle/Hog Price Spread
Chris Hurt
2003· article· en· Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
A Statistical Profile of the Pork Supply Chain
Samuel Bonti‐Ankomah
2005· article· en· AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Canada: Estimates of support to agriculture (CAD)
2018· other· en· Agricultural policy monitoring and evaluation· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
AGRICULTURE IN CANADA: WHO WILL GROW THE FOOD?
Mel L. Lerohl, James R. Unterschultz
2000· article· en· AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Rethinking Agricultural Policy Regimes
2012· other· en· Research in rural sociology and development· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Ag Letter
2009· article· en· AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About