Rethinking Agricultural Policy Regimes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2012), "Rethinking Agricultural Policy Regimes", Almås, R. and Campbell, H. (Ed.) Rethinking Agricultural Policy Regimes: Food Security, Climate Change and the Future Resilience of Global Agriculture (Research in Rural Sociology and Development, Vol. 18), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. i. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1057-1922(2012)0000018016 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters Rethinking Agricultural Policy Regimes Research in Rural Sociology and Development Research in Rural Sociology and Development Copyright page List of Contributors Introduction: Emerging Challenges, New Policy Frameworks and the Resilience of Agriculture The Evolution of Western Agricultural Policy Since 1945 The Rejuvenation of Productivist Agriculture: The Case for ‘Cooperative Neo-Productivism’ Western European Approaches to and Interpretations of Multifunctional Agriculture – and Some Implications of a Possible Neo-Productivist Turn Food Regime Crisis and Revaluing the Agrarian Question The Food Crisis and the Changing Nature of Scottish Agricultural Policy Discourse The Worlds of Dairy: Comparing Dairy Frameworks in Canada and New Zealand in Light of Future Shocks to Food Systems Norwegian Dairy Industry: A Case of Super-Regulated Co-Operativism The Complex Outcomes of Neoliberalisation in New Zealand: Productivism, Audit and the Challenge of Future Energy and Climate Shocks Emerging Neo-Productivist Agriculture as an Approach to Food Security and Climate Change in Norway Comparison of Bioenergy Policies in Denmark and Germany Commodity Competition: Divergent Trajectories in New Zealand Pastoral Farming Reframing Policy Regimes and the Future Resilience of Global Agriculture About the Authors
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".