MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,287 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,287 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 16 of 26

Labels cover 7 of 1,287 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,287 of 1,287 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
In Reply to Norman et al and to Ilgen et al
Pat Croskerry, David Petrie, James B. Reilly, Gordon Tait
2014· letter· en· Academic Medicine· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affgpt · no categorygrok · no categoryopus · no categorymodels agree
Script concordance test examinations: Student perception and study approaches
Stephen Bacchi, Ian K. T. Tan, Ivana Chim, Matthew A Dabarno, Stuart Lubarsky, Paul Duggan
2019· article· en· Focus on Health Professional Education A Multi-Professional Journal· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
afffundunlabeled
Post Hoc Bias in Treatment Decisions
Donald A. Redelmeier, Eldar Shafir
2024· article· en· JAMA Network Open· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
4
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Desk Rejections: Not Without Due Deliberation
Mohit Goyal, Sham Santhanam, Vinod Ravindran
2022· letter· en· The Journal of Rheumatology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Is Anecdotal Evidence Science?
A. F. Gupta
2025· article· en· American Journal of Qualitative Research· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
3
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Évaluations psychosociales
Philippe Masson
2013· article· fr· Nouvelles pratiques sociales· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About