MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

967 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
967 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 16 of 20

Labels cover 9 of 967 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 967 of 967 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Modus Darwin redux
Christopher Stephens
2024· article· en· Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Canadian Pavilion
2008· other· NDSU Repository (North Dakota State University)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Interview: Bas van Fraassen
Joshua Babic, Lorenzo Cocco, Michal Hladky
2017· article· en· Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
9781800082274.pdf
2022· other· en· OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Contributions of Metatheoretical Structuralism
Cláudio Abreu
2023· book· en· LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Generalbassübungen grabner pdf
2024· other· de· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Modèles scientifiques
Frédéric Bouchard
2015· book-chapter· fr· Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Conditional expectations
John H. Walsh
2012· book-chapter· en· Graduate studies in mathematics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Natural Kinds
Muhammad Ali Khalidi
2023· article· en· PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Théorie scientifique
Luc Faucher
2015· book-chapter· fr· Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Raoul Bott at Harvard
Shing–Tung Yau, Steve Nadis
2014· article· en· Notices of the International Consortium of Chinese Mathematicians· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
What is Data?
Ananya Chattoraj
2023· dissertation· en· Open MIND· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The merits of imperfection
Yiyun Li, Sarah Shun‐lien Bynum
2020· article· en· The Yale Review· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
On the Reliability of Science
Joseph Agassi
2011· article· en· Philosophy of the Social Sciences· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Fishing for philosophical phylogenetic foibles
Root Gorelick
2014· article· en· DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
What is Reason?
2019· article· en· DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Feyerabendian Pragmatism
Jeff Foss
2018· article· en· Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Why Things Have Outlines
Kermit Snelson
2019· book-chapter· en· Semiotics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About