MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,033 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20092025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,033 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 16 of 21

Labels cover 1 of 1,033 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,033 of 1,033 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
A Tale of Two Circularization Periods
J. J. Zanazzi
2022· article· en· The Astrophysical Journal Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
affunlabeled
Where Did the Amaterasu Particle Come From?
M. Unger, Glennys R. Farrar
2024· article· en· The Astrophysical Journal Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
The Magnetic Field in the Milky Way Filamentary Bone G47
Ian Stephens, Philip C. Myers, Catherine Zucker, James M. Jackson, B. G. Andersson, Rowan J. Smith +18 more
2022· article· en· The Astrophysical Journal Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
The Second Earth Trojan 2020 XL<sub>5</sub>
Man-To Hui, Paul Wiegert, D. J. Tholen, Dóra Föhring
2021· article· en· The Astrophysical Journal Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affunlabeled
The Discovery of Two LISA Sources within 0.5 kpc
Mukremin Kilic, Warren R. Brown, Antoine Bédard, Alekzander Kosakowski
2021· article· en· The Astrophysical Journal Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Discovery of Merging Twin Quasars at z = 6.05
Yoshiki Matsuoka, Takuma Izumi, Masafusa Onoue, Michael A. Strauss, K. Iwasawa, Nobunari Kashikawa +11 more
2024· article· en· The Astrophysical Journal Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About