MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,119 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,119 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 17 of 23

Labels cover 1 of 1,119 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,119 of 1,119 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Business Case for Business Ethics
Alex C. Michalos
2023· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Foreword
Roderick MacLeod, Eric Abrahamson
2010· book-chapter· en· McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
INDIVIDUAL PIONEERS IN THE USA AND CANADA
2007· book-chapter· en· Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Profile: Erin Johnson
Leanne Olson
2017· article· en· Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/b978-0-434-98484-8.50030-4
2000· book-chapter· en· Time to knit· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Tables and Figures
2001· book-chapter· en· McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Philanthropic Behaviour of Quebecers
Rose Anne Devlin, Wenzhuo Zhao
2016· preprint· en· RePEc: Research Papers in Economics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueno abstractunlabeled
NGOs in India: A Cross-Sectional Study
Mathew Zachariah
2003· article· en· Pacific Affairs· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Editorial
J.J. McMurtry, Denyse Côté
2016· editorial· en· Canadian journal of nonprofit and social economy research· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Back Matter
Michael Quinn Patton, Nathaniel Evaluation, John Foote, James Radner, M Phil, Nathaniel Foote
2015· paratext· en· The Foundation Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
A Word from our Fundraising Consultant
Lisa Di Veto
2018· article· en· Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About