MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,645 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,645 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 18 of 53

Labels cover 6 of 2,645 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,645 of 2,645 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
White dwarfs as a probe of exceptionally light QCD axions
Reuven Balkin, Javi Serra, Konstantin Springmann, Stefan Stelzl, Andreas Weiler
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
affunlabeled
[no title]
Deepto Chakrabarty, Frederick K. Lamb, Simin Mahmoodifar, M. Coleman Miller, Sharon M. Morsink, Thomas E. Riley +7 more
2019· article· en· UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
45
citations
fundno affunlabeled
[no title]
R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, A. Adams +92 more
2021· article· ca· Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
43
citations
affunlabeled
Quadratic gravity: From weak to strong
Bob Holdom, Jing Ren
2016· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics D· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
afffundunlabeled
Possible physical realizations of the Tolman VII solution
Ambrish M. Raghoonundun, David Hobill
2015· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
afffundunlabeled
Nonlinear Ringdown at the Black Hole Horizon
Neev Khera, Ariadna Ribes Metidieri, Béatrice Bonga, Xisco Jiménez Forteza, B. Krishnan, Eric Poisson +3 more
2023· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
affunlabeled
Constraints on the FRB rate at 700–900 MHz
Liam Connor, Hsiu-Hsien Lin, Kiyoshi W. Masui, Niels Oppermann, Ue‐Li Pen, J. B. Peterson +2 more
2016· article· en· Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About