MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

This cohort has 196,966 works, more than the 100,000-row export cap: the file will contain the first 100,000 ordered by OpenAlex id, and says so in its last line. Narrow the cohort, page the API, or rebuild the frame from the repository for the rest. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

196,966 results · 2 filters active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
196,966 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 184 of 3,940

Labels cover 472 of 196,966 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 196,966 of 196,966 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
Flat-top oscillons in an expanding universe
Mustafa A. Amin, David Shirokoff
2010· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
132
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Isolated critical point from Lovelock gravity
2014· article· en· Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
132
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Symptomatology of cancer patients in palliative care
Annette S Strömgren, M. Groenvold, Lars Møller Pedersen, Per Sjøgren
2002· article· en· European Journal of Cancer· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
132
citations
fundaboutno affunlabeled
Four Experiments on the Perception of Bar Charts
Justin Talbot, Vidya Setlur, Anushka Anand
2014· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
132
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Data Politics
Didier Bigo, Engin F. Isin, Evelyn Ruppert
2019· book· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
132
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Silibinin: A novel inhibitor of Aβ aggregation
Fei Yin, Jianhui Liu, Xiuhong Ji, Yanwen Wang, Jeffrey A. Zidichouski, Junzeng Zhang
2010· article· en· Neurochemistry International· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
131
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
ZIKA virus entry mechanisms in human cells
Almerinda Agrelli, Ronald Moura, Sérgio Crovella, Lucas André Cavalcanti Brandão
2019· review· en· Infection Genetics and Evolution· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
131
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About