MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,177 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,177 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 19 of 24

Labels cover 1 of 1,177 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,177 of 1,177 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Confidence biases and learning among intuitive Bayesians
Louis Lévy‐Garboua, Muniza Askari, Marco Gazel
2018· article· en· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Robust inattentive discrete choice
Lars Peter Hansen, Jianjun Miao, Hao Xing
2025· article· en· Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
Sunk cost predictions as theory of mind
Amy Howard, Claudia G. Sehl, Stephanie Denison, Ori Friedman
2024· article· en· Judgment and Decision Making· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
Conditional Expected Utility
Massimiliano Amarante
2013· preprint· en· RePEc: Research Papers in Economics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
Task completion without commitment
David Freeman, Kevin Laughren
2024· article· en· Experimental Economics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Random choice and market demand
Javier A. Birchenall
2023· article· en· Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Physical Contact and Financial Risk Taking
Jonathan Levav, Jennifer Argo
2009· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Endogenous Risk Attitudes
Jakub Steiner, Nick Netzer, Arthur J. Robson, Pavel Kocourek
2021· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Rare and extreme outcomes in risky choice
Alice Mason, Elliot A. Ludvig, Marcia L. Spetch, Christopher R. Madan
2023· preprint· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Decision-Making
Michał Białek, Artur Domurat, Ethan Andrew Meyers
2022· book-chapter· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Preferences, Habits, and Free Choice
Ann Levey
2025· book-chapter· en· Synthese Library/Synthese library· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Preferences under uncertainty
Martin J. Osborne, Ariel Rubinstein
2023· book-chapter· en· Open Book Publishers· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Confiance, métacognition et perception
Sébastien Massoni
2017· article· fr· L Actualité économique· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Sunk-cost judgments across the child to adult lifespan
Zachariah I. Hamzagic, Eric Y. Mah, Daniel G. Derksen, Daniel M. Bernstein
2025· article· en· Psychonomic Bulletin & Review· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About