MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,822 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,822 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 19 of 57

Labels cover 145 of 2,822 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,822 of 2,822 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Human research review committee requirements in medical journals
Scott Freeman, Kristy Lundahl, Lisa M. Schilling, J. Daniel Jensen, Robert P. Dellavalle
2008· review· en· Clinical and investigative medicine· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+sts+research_integrity+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch+research_integrity
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Why the Debate over Minimal Risk Needs to be Reconsidered
Ariella Binik, Charles Weijer
2014· article· en· The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+sts+research_integrityconsensus · none
15
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Keeping Faith: Ethics and the Physician-Writer
Jack Coulehan, Anne Hunsaker Hawkins
2003· article· en· Annals of Internal Medicine· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?
Isabelle Budin‐Ljøsne, Anne Marie Tassé, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Jennifer R. Harris
2011· article· en· BMC Medical Genomics· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Modeling consent in the time of COVID-19
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Michael J. S. Beauvais, Yann Joly, Ma’n H. Zawati, Simon Rousseau, Michaël Chassé +1 more
2020· article· en· Journal of Law and the Biosciences· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Biobank: What's in a Name?
Peter H. Watson, Robert E. Hewitt, Daniel Catchpoole, William E. Grizzle
2019· article· en· Biopreservation and Biobanking· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
India's new policy to protect research participants
Jeremy Sugarman, Anant Bhan, Robert C. Bollinger, Amita Gupta
2013· editorial· en· BMJ· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+research_integrity+insufficient_payloadconsensus · research_integrity+insufficient_payload
14
citations
affunlabeled
Improving the Quality of Abstract Reporting for Phase I Cancer Trials
Elizabeth L. Strevel, Nicole G. Chau, Gregory R. Pond, Anthony J. Murgo, Percy Ivy, Lillian L. Siu
2008· article· en· Clinical Cancer Research· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+sts+research_integrity+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch
14
citations
affunlabeled
The Harm-Benefit Tradeoff in “Bad Deal” Trials
Gillian Nycum, Lynette Reid
2007· article· en· Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
14
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Consent in Alzheimer's Disease Research: Risk/Benefit Factors
B. Lynn Beattie
2007· review· en· Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+sts+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch+sts+research_integrity
14
citations
affunlabeled
Undue inducement: a case study in CAPRISA 008
Kathryn Mngadi, Jerome Amir Singh, Leila E. Mansoor, Douglas Wassenaar
2017· article· en· Journal of Medical Ethics· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch+research_integrity
14
citations
affunlabeled
Ethically designing research to inform multidimensional, rapidly evolving policy decisions: Lessons learned from the PROMISE HIV Perinatal Prevention Trial
Seema Shah, Alex John London, Lynne Mofenson, James V. Lavery, Grace John‐Stewart, Patricia M. Flynn +11 more
2021· review· en· Clinical Trials· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+research_integrity+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch+research_integrity+insufficient_payload
14
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Research Ethics for Clinical Researchers
John D. Harnett, R.S. Neuman
2015· article· en· Methods in molecular biology· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch+research_integrity
14
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About