MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,745 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,745 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 19 of 35

Labels cover 4 of 1,745 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,745 of 1,745 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundno abstractunlabeled
Pure Obsessions
David A. Clark, Brendan D. Guyitt
2007· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
OCD Subtypes: Which, If Any, Are Valid?
Marsha Rowsell, Sarah E. Francis
2015· article· en· Clinical Psychology Science and Practice· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
Tics
Tamara Pringsheim, William Jeptha Davenport, Anthony E. Lang
2003· review· en· Current Opinion in Neurology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Brain injury due to head banging in Tourette
Alfonso Fasano, Vincenzo Galluccio
2018· letter· en· Parkinsonism & Related Disorders· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Discussion
Dean McKay, Jonathan S. Abramowitz, Steven Taylor
2007· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
9
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About