MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390697660 · doi:10.1101/2024.01.07.24300816

Sex Differences in People with Tourette Syndrome and Persistent Motor or Vocal Tic Disorder in the Tourette Association of America International Consortium for Genetics Database

2024· preprint· en· W4390697660 on OpenAlexaff
Marisela Dy-Hollins, Lori B. Chibnik, Natasha Tracy, Lisa Osiecki, Cathy L. Budman, Daniëlle C. Cath, Marco A. Grados, Robert A. King, Gholson J. Lyon, Guy A. Rouleau, Paul Sandor, Harvey S. Singer, Nutan Sharma, Carol A. Mathews, Jeremiah M. Scharf

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institutes of HealthTourette Association of America
KeywordsTourette syndromeTicsComorbidityTic disorderPsychologyAge of onsetPsychiatryMedicineClinical psychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objective: Tourette Syndrome (TS) and Persistent Motor or Vocal Tic Disorders (PMVT) are more prevalent in males (vs. females). Females with TS may have a delay in diagnosis, and more complex tic features (vs. males). With respect to comorbidities, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is more prevalent in females; attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is more prevalent in males. Less is known about sex differences in PMVT. This study analyzes sex differences in outcomes among individuals with TS and PMVT in the Tourette Association of America International Consortium for Genetics dataset (TAAICG). Design/Methods: Data from 2403 individuals (N=2109 TS; N=294 PMVT) from the TAAICG were analyzed to explore the relationship between sex and TS or PMVT outcomes: age at tic onset; age at diagnosis; time-to-diagnosis; tic severity; and comorbidity rates. Regression models were adjusted for age and family relationships to examine the impact of sex on outcomes. Results: Females with TS (25.5% of the sample) had a later age of symptom onset (6.5±2.8 vs. 6.0±2.7; p=0.001), later age at diagnosis (13.3±11.2 vs. 10.7±8.1; p=0.0001), and a longer time-to-diagnosis [3 (1,7) vs. 2 (1,5), p=0.01] than males. The total Yale-Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) was lower in females with TS (28.4±9.1 vs. 30.7±8.7); p<0.0001); OCD was slightly more prevalent in females (55% vs. 48.7%; p=0.01) although OCD severity did not differ by sex; ADHD was more prevalent in males (55.7% vs 38.9%; p<0.001). Females with TS had 0.46 lower odds of being diagnosed with TS (p<0.00001). Females with PMVT (42.9% of the sample) had an earlier age of symptom onset (7.9±3.3 vs. 8.9±3.7; p=0.05). Motor or vocal tic severity (YGTSS) was not significantly different. OCD, but not ADHD, was more prevalent in females (OCD: 41.9% vs. 22.2%; p<0.001: ADHD:16.5% vs 21.0%; p=0.4). Conclusion: Females with TS are less likely to be formally diagnosed and have a later age of symptom onset, later age at diagnosis, longer time-to-diagnosis, higher prevalence of OCD, and lower prevalence of ADHD (vs. males). Females with PMVT have an earlier age of symptom onset, higher prevalence of OCD, but similar ADHD prevalence rates (vs. males). Females with TS and PMVT may be clinically different than males with TS. Future research is needed to understand differences longitudinally in TS and PMVT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFrench-language works237,207