MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Free Will and Agency
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

437 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
437 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 9

Labels cover 1 of 437 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 437 of 437 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
The Guise of the Guise of the Bad
Sergio Tenenbaum
2017· article· en· Ethical Theory and Moral Practice· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Sensation of agency and perception of temporal order
Jana Timm, Marc Schönwiesner, Iria SanMiguel, Erich Schröger
2013· article· en· Consciousness and Cognition· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
affunlabeled
Let me Take the Wheel: Illusory Control and Sense of Agency
Juliette Tobias‐Webb, Eve H. Limbrick‐Oldfield, Claire M. Gillan, James W. Moore, Michael R. F. Aitken, Luke Clark
2016· article· en· Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
The importance of agency in human reward processing
Cameron D. Hassall, Greg Hajcak, Olave E. Krigolson
2019· article· en· Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affunlabeled
Exploitation and demeaning choices
Jeremy Snyder
2013· article· en· Politics Philosophy & Economics· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Limits of the Harm Principle
Hamish Stewart
2009· article· en· Criminal Law and Philosophy· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
28
citations
afffundno abstractgemma · stsgpt · scholarly_communicationmodels split
Media Portrayal of a Landmark Neuroscience Experiment on Free Will
Éric Racine, Valentin Nguyen, Victoria Saigle, Veljko Dubljević
2016· article· en· Science and Engineering Ethics· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
27
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Does ought imply can?
Miklós Kürthy, Holly Lawford‐Smith, Paulo Sousa
2017· article· en· PLoS ONE· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affunlabeled
Reconsidering the <i>Ad Hominem</i>
Christopher M. Johnson
2009· article· en· Philosophy· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affunlabeled
The Worst Things in Life
Wayne Sumner
2020· article· en· Grazer Philosophische Studien· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affunlabeled
Integrity and Moral Danger
Greg Scherkoske
2010· article· en· Canadian Journal of Philosophy· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Selective Hard Compatibilism
Paul Russell
2010· book-chapter· en· The MIT Press eBooks· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
affunlabeled
Diminishing and Enhancing Free Will
Walter Glannon
2011· article· en· AJOB Neuroscience· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Criminal punishment and the right to rule
Malcolm Thorburn
2020· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Indeterministic Choice and Ability
Ishtiyaque Haji, Ryan Hebert
2018· article· en· The Journal of Ethics· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Ability, Frankfurt Examples, and Obligation
Ishtiyaque Haji, Ryan Hebert
2018· article· en· The Journal of Ethics· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About