MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,999 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,999 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 40

Labels cover 2 of 1,999 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,999 of 1,999 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundno abstractunlabeled
Comparing Anomaly Detection Techniques for HTTP
Kenneth L. Ingham, Hajime Inoue
2007· book-chapter· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
132
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Network Intrusion Detection and Prevention
Ali A. Ghorbani, Wei Lu, Mahbod Tavallaee
2009· book· en· Advances in information security· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
132
citations
afffundunlabeled
Intrusion Detection Systems: A Cross-Domain Overview
Lionel Nganyewou Tidjon, Marc Frappier, Amel Mammar
2019· article· en· IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
128
citations
affunlabeled
Malware Propagation in Large-Scale Networks
Shui Yu, Guofei Gu, Ahmed Barnawi, Song Guo, Ivan Stojmenović
2014· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
123
citations
afffundunlabeled
Alert correlation survey
Reza Sadoddin, Ali A. Ghorbani
2006· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
107
citations
affunlabeled
Army of Botnets
Ryan Vogt, John Aycock, Michael J. Jacobson
2007· article· en· Network and Distributed System Security Symposium· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
99
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About