MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,183 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,183 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 64

Labels cover 5 of 3,183 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,183 of 3,183 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Symbolic Control of Visual Attention
Bernhard Hommel, Jay Pratt, Lorenza S. Colzato, Richard Godijn
2001· article· en· Psychological Science· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
405
citations
afffundunlabeled
How attention gates social interactions
Francesca Capozzi, Jelena Ristic
2018· review· en· Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
393
citations
affunlabeled
Effects of Focal Frontal Lesions on Response Inhibition
T. W. Picton, D. T. Stuss, Michael P. Alexander, Tim Shallice, Malcolm A. Binns, Susan Gillingham
2006· article· en· Cerebral Cortex· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
383
citations
afffundunlabeled
Pupillometry
Sylvain Sirois, Julie Brisson
2014· article· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
371
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed
Donald T. Stuss, Michael P. Alexander, Tim Shallice, Terence W. Picton, Malcolm A. Binns, Ronald J. MacDonald +2 more
2004· article· en· Neuropsychologia· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
330
citations
affunlabeled
Actions modulate attentional capture
Timothy N. Welsh, Jay Pratt
2008· article· en· Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
318
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Attention Response Functions
Jody C. Culham, Patrick Cavanagh, Nancy Kanwisher
2001· article· en· Neuron· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
316
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Anatomy of deductive reasoning
Vinod Goel
2007· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
307
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About