MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

880 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
880 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 18

Labels cover 1 of 880 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 880 of 880 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The costs of using JXTA
Emir Halepovic, Ralph Deters
2004· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
affunlabeled
Collaborative Document Clustering
Khaled M. Hammouda, Mohamed S. Kamel
2006· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
affunlabeled
Server selection in large-scale video-on-demand systems
Niklas Carlsson, Derek L. Eager
2010· article· en· ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
affunlabeled
Enhancing peer-to-peer systems through redundancy
Paola Flocchini, Amiya Nayak, Minghao Xie
2007· article· en· IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A taxonomy of decentralized online social networks
Shihabur Rahman Chowdhury, Arup Roy, Maheen Shaikh, Khuzaima Daudjee
2014· article· en· Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About