MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Quantum many-body systems
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

705 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
705 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 15

Labels cover 1 of 705 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 705 of 705 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Machine learning for quantum matter
2020· article· en· Advances in Physics X· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
141
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Quantum Hamiltonian Complexity
Sevag Gharibian, Yichen Huang, Zeph Landau, Seung Woo Shin
2015· article· en· Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
140
citations
affunlabeled
How Universal Is the Entanglement Spectrum?
Anushya Chandran, Vedika Khemani, S. L. Sondhi
2014· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
114
citations
affunlabeled
Machine-Learning Quantum States in the NISQ Era
Giacomo Torlai, Roger G. Melko
2019· article· en· Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
103
citations
afffundunlabeled
Computationally Universal Phase of Quantum Matter
Robert Raussendorf, Cihan Okay, Dongsheng Wang, David T. Stephen, Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup
2019· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
103
citations
afffundunlabeled
Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation
Andrew King, Alberto Nocera, Marek M. Rams, Jacek Dziarmaga, Roeland Wiersema, William Bernoudy +57 more
2025· article· en· Science· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
100
citations
afffundunlabeled
Neural Gutzwiller-projected variational wave functions
Francesco Ferrari, Federico Becca, Juan Carrasquilla
2019· article· en· Physical review. B./Physical review. B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
100
citations
affunlabeled
A hierarchy of topological tensor network states
Oliver Buerschaper, Juan Martín Mombelli, Matthias Christandl, M. Aguado
2013· article· en· Journal of Mathematical Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
92
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About