MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
User Authentication and Security Systems
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

570 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
570 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 12

Labels cover 1 of 570 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 570 of 570 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The Password Life Cycle
Elizabeth Stobert, Robert Biddle
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
58
citations
affunlabeled
Do you see your password?
Nicholas J. Wright, Andrew S. Patrick, Robert Biddle
2012· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
56
citations
affunlabeled
A Novel 3D Graphical Password Schema
Fawaz A. Alsulaiman, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik
2006· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
53
citations
affunlabeled
Social Behavioral Biometrics: An Emerging Trend
Madeena Sultana, Padma Polash Paul, Marina L. Gavrilova
2015· article· en· International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
affunlabeled
Proximity-based authentication of mobile devices
Adin Scannell, Alexander Varshavsky, Anthony LaMarca, Eyal de Lara
2009· article· en· International Journal of Security and Networks· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
45
citations
afffundunlabeled
Tapas
Daniel McCarney, David Barrera, Jeremy Clark, Sonia Chiasson, Paul C. van Oorschot
2012· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
affunlabeled
On the Impact of Touch ID on iPhone Passcodes
Ivan Cherapau, Ildar Muslukhov, Nalin Asanka, Konstantin Beznosov
2015· article· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
affunlabeled
Reverse Engineering CAPTCHAs
Abram Hindle, Michael W. Godfrey, Richard C. Holt
2008· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations
affunlabeled
Textured agreements
Matthew Kay, Michael Terry
2009· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
35
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About