MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Space Science Reviews
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

120 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
120 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 3

Labels cover 0 of 120 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 120 of 120 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Impacts of Cosmic Dust on Planetary Atmospheres and Surfaces
J. M. C. Plane, G. J. Flynn, Anni Määttänen, John E. Moores, A. R. Poppe, Juan Diego Carrillo‐Sánchez +1 more
2017· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
61
citations
afffundunlabeled
Strong Gravitational Lensing as a Probe of Dark Matter
S. Vegetti, Simon Birrer, Giulia Despali, C. D. Fassnacht, Daniel Gilman, Yashar Hezaveh +5 more
2024· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
56
citations
affunlabeled
Physical Processes of Meso-Scale, Dynamic Auroral Forms
C. Forsyth, В. А. Сергеев, M. G. Henderson, Y. Nishimura, Bea Gallardo‐Lacourt
2020· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
55
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Updated Review of Planetary Atmospheric Electricity
Yoav Yair, G. Fischer, F. Simões, N. Rennó, P. Zarka
2008· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
53
citations
afffundunlabeled
The CASSIOPE/e-POP Magnetic Field Instrument (MGF)
D. D. Wallis, David M. Miles, B. Barry Narod, J. R. Bennest, K. R. Murphy, I. R. Mann +1 more
2014· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
53
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Hermean Magnetosphere-Solar Wind Interaction
M. Fujimoto, W. Baumjohann, К. Кабин, R. Nakamura, J. A. Slavin, Naoki Terada +1 more
2007· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
53
citations
afffundunlabeled
The e-POP Radio Receiver Instrument on CASSIOPE
H. G. James, E. P. King, Andrew P. White, R. H. Hum, W. H. H. L. Lunscher, C. L. Siefring
2015· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
affunlabeled
Evolution of Solar and Stellar Dynamo Theory
Paul Charbonneau, D. D. Sokoloff
2023· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
afffundunlabeled
Physical Models for Solar Cycle Predictions
Prantika Bhowmik, Jie Jiang, Lisa Upton, Alexandre Lemerle, Dibyendu Nandy
2023· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
45
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Rosetta Alpha Particle X-Ray Spectrometer (APXS)
G. Klingelhöfer, J. Brückner, C. d’Uston, R. Gellert, R. Rieder
2007· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
25 Years of Self-organized Criticality: Space and Laboratory Plasmas
A. S. Sharma, Markus J. Aschwanden, Norma B. Crosby, A. J. Klimas, Alexander V. Milovanov, Laura Morales +2 more
2015· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
37
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Urey: Mars Organic and Oxidant Detector
Jeffrey L. Bada, P. Ehrenfreund, F. J. Grunthaner, D. L. Blaney, Max Coleman, Allen Farrington +15 more
2007· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
afffundunlabeled
Small-Scale Dynamic Aurora
Ryuho Kataoka, C. C. Chaston, D. J. Knudsen, K. A. Lynch, R. L. Lysak, Yan Song +5 more
2021· review· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
afffundunlabeled
The CASSIOPE/e-POP Suprathermal Electron Imager (SEI)
D. J. Knudsen, J. K. Burchill, Taylor Cameron, Greg Enno, Andrew Howarth, A. W. Yau
2015· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
THEMIS Ground Based Observatory System Design
S. E. Harris, S. B. Mende, V. Angelopoulos, W. Rachelson, E. Donovan, B. J. Jackel +6 more
2007· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Quiet, Discrete Auroral Arcs: Acceleration Mechanisms
R. L. Lysak, Marius Echim, Tomas Karlsson, Octav Marghitu, R. Rankin, Y. Song +1 more
2020· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
Searching for Strong Gravitational Lenses
Cameron Lemon, F. Courbin, Anupreeta More, Paul L. Schechter, R. Cañameras, Ludovic Delchambre +6 more
2024· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Fast Auroral Imager (FAI) for the e-POP Mission
L. L. Cogger, Andrew Howarth, A. W. Yau, Andrew White, Greg Enno, T. Trondsen +7 more
2014· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affunlabeled
Results from InSight Robotic Arm Activities
M. P. Golombek, T. L. Hudson, Philip Bailey, Nadya Balabanska, E. Marteau, Constantinos Charalambous +38 more
2023· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The IMAGE Observatory
William C. Gibson, J. L. Burch, J. Scherrer, Mark B. Tapley, Ronnie Killough, F. A. Volpe +5 more
2000· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Topics in Microphysics of Relativistic Plasmas
Maxim Lyutikov, Alexandre Lazarian
2013· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About