MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210341575 · doi:10.1007/s11214-022-00870-x

A Review of the EUSO-Balloon Pathfinder for the JEM-EUSO Program

2022· review· en· W4210341575 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
J. H. Adams, S. Ahmad, D. Allard, A. Anzalone, S. Bacholle, P. Barrillon, J. Bayer, М. Бертаина, L. Conti, C. Blaksley, S. Blin-Bondil, P. Bobík, F. Cafagna, D. Campana, Francesca Capel, M. Casolino, Claudio Cassardo, C. Catalano, Roberto Cremonini, S. Dagoret-Campagne, Pascale Danto, L. del Peral, C. De La Taille, A. Díaz Damian, M. Dupieux, A. Ebersoldt, Toshikazu Ebisuzaki, Johannes Eser, Jean Evrard, Francesco Fenu, S. Ferrarese, C. Fornaro, M. Fouka, P. Gorodetzky, F. Guarino, A. Guzmán, Y. Hachisu, A. Haungs, E. G. Judd, A. Jung, J. Karczmarczyk, Y. Kawasaki, П. А. Климов, E. Kuznetsov, Š. Mackovjak, М. Манфрин, L. Marcelli, Gustavo Medina‐Tanco, K. Mercier, Andrés Merino, T. Mernik, H. Miyamoto, J. A. Morales de los Ríos, C. Moretto, B. Mot, A. Neronov, H. Ohmori, Angela V. Olinto, G. Osteria, B. Panico, E. Parizot, T. Paul, P. Picozza, L. W. Piotrowski, Z. Plebaniak, Samuel Pliego, P. Prat, G. Prévôt, H. Prieto, M. Putiš, Jorge Rabanal-Arabach, M. Ricci, Jimena Rojas, M. D. Rodríguez-Friás, G. Roudil, G. Sáez-Cano, Z. Sahnoun, Н. Сакаки, Jonathan Sanchez, A. Santangelo, F. Sarazin, V. Scotti, K. Shinozaki, H. Silva, Jorge F. Soriano, G. Suino, J. Szabelski, S. Toscano, Ilaria Tabone, Y. Takizawa, P. von Ballmoos, Lawrence Wiencke, M. Wille, M. Yu. Zotov

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace Science Reviews · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanadian Space AgencyHelmholtz Alliance for Astroparticle PhysicsState Space Corporation ROSCOSMOSNarodowe Centrum NaukiMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVLomonosov Moscow State UniversityMinistero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione InternazionaleCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesUniversidad Nacional Autonoma de HondurasHelmholtz-GemeinschaftSlovenská Akadémia ViedAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaStrongComunidad de MadridRIKENNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPathfinderCosmic rayPhysicsBalloonLaserRemote sensingUltravioletDetectorEnvironmental scienceAstronomyOpticsGeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract EUSO-Balloon is a pathfinder for JEM-EUSO, the mission concept of a spaceborne observatory which is designed to observe Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray (UHECR)-induced Extensive Air Showers (EAS) by detecting their UltraViolet (UV) light tracks “from above.” On August 25, 2014, EUSO-Balloon was launched from Timmins Stratospheric Balloon Base (Ontario, Canada) by the balloon division of the French Space Agency CNES. After reaching a floating altitude of 38 km, EUSO-Balloon imaged the UV light in the wavelength range ∼290–500 nm for more than 5 hours using the key technologies of JEM-EUSO. The flight allowed a good understanding of the performance of the detector to be developed, giving insights into possible improvements to be applied to future missions. A detailed measurement of the photoelectron counts in different atmospheric and ground conditions was achieved. By means of the simulation of the instrument response and by assuming atmospheric models, the absolute intensity of diffuse light was estimated. The instrument detected hundreds of laser tracks with similar characteristics to EASs shot by a helicopter flying underneath. These are the first recorded laser tracks measured from a fluorescence detector looking down on the atmosphere. The reconstruction of the direction of the laser tracks was performed. In this work, a review of the main results obtained by EUSO-Balloon is presented as well as implications for future space-based observations of UHECRs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpace Science ReviewsSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207