MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,523 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,523 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 20 of 31

Labels cover 2 of 1,523 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,523 of 1,523 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Social judgments from faces and bodies.
R. Thora Bjornsdottir, Paul Connor, Nicholas O. Rule
2024· article· en· Journal of Personality and Social Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
How Do People Feel About Mates?
Paul W. Eastwick, Samantha Joel
2024· review· en· Annual Review of Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
afffundunlabeled
Strategies for dating earliest memories
Carole Peterson, Qi Wang, N. Brandon Lillington, Darcy Hallett
2022· article· en· Applied Cognitive Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Good genes, mating effort, and delinquency
Martin L. Lalumière, Vernon L. Quinsey
2000· article· en· Behavioral and Brain Sciences· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Predictors of infidelity among couples
Charlene F. Belu, Lucia F. O’Sullivan
2024· article· en· The Journal of Sexual Medicine· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Violence and Homicide Following Partner Infidelity
Steven Arnocky, Adam C. Davis, Ashley Locke, Larissa McKelvie, Tracy Vaillancourt
2022· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
WITHDRAWN
Ian V. McPhail, Alexander F. Schmidt
2023· preprint· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About