MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,079 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,079 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 20 of 42

Labels cover 5 of 2,079 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,079 of 2,079 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
alaric parton shower for hadron colliders
Stefan Hoeche, Frank Krauss, Daniel Reichelt
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Gravitational Higgs mechanism in neutron star interiors
Andrew Coates, Michael Horbatsch, Thomas P. Sotiriou
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affunlabeled
Search for Majoron-like particles with CUPID-0
O. Azzolini, J. W. Beeman, F. Bellini, M. Beretta, M. Biassoni, C. Brofferio +46 more
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Asymptotic flatness and Hawking quasilocal mass
Valerio Faraoni, Andrea Giusti, Tyler F. Bean
2021· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Disruption of cosmic string wakes by Gaussian fluctuations
Disrael Camargo Neves da Cunha, Robert Brandenberger, Oscar F. Hernández
2016· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affunlabeled
Search for long-lived heavy neutral leptons decaying in the CMS muon detectors in proton-proton collisions at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math>
A. Hayrapetyan, A. Tumasyan, W. Adam, Janik Walter Andrejkovic, T. Bergauer, S. Chatterjee +2302 more
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Black lenses in string theory
Hari K. Kunduri, James Lucietti
2016· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
afffundunlabeled
Extremal Higgs couplings
Joan Elias Miró, Andrea L. Guerrieri, Mehmet Asım Gümüş
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Correlating <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi> </mml:math> with electric dipole moments in the two Higgs doublet model in light of the diphoton excesses at 95 GeV and 152 GeV
Sumit Banik, Guglielmo Coloretti, Andreas Crivellin, Howard E. Haber
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Centerless BMS charge algebra
Antoine Rignon-Bret, Simone Speziale
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
afffundunlabeled
Symmetries and charges in Weyl-Fefferman-Graham gauge
Luca Ciambelli, Arnaud Delfante, Romain Ruzziconi, Céline Zwikel
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About