MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,389 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,389 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 21 of 48

Labels cover 3 of 2,389 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,389 of 2,389 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Toward cognitive models of misophonia
Marie‐Anick Savard, Emily B. J. Coffey
2025· review· en· Hearing Research· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Temporal-Envelope Reconstruction for Hearing-Impaired Listeners
Christian Lorenzi, Nicolas Wallaert, Dan Gnansia, Agnès C. Léger, D. Timothy Ives, A. Chays +2 more
2012· article· en· Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Force and pressure measurements in temporal bones
Chantal Snels, J. Thomas Roland, Claudiu Treaba, Daniel Jethanamest, Wendy J. Huinck, David R. Friedmann +2 more
2020· article· en· American Journal of Otolaryngology· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
High-Resolution Computed Tomography of Temporal Bone
Rosser Powitzky, L. Anne Hayman, Soenke H. Bartling, Jason Chau, Rajiv Gupta, Vershalee Shukla
2006· article· en· Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
Discovering acoustic structure of novel sounds
Christian E. Stilp, Michael Kiefte, Keith R. Kluender
2018· article· en· The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About