MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

This cohort has 4,299,418 works, more than the 100,000-row export cap: the file will contain the first 100,000 ordered by OpenAlex id, and says so in its last line. Narrow the cohort, page the API, or rebuild the frame from the repository for the rest. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

4,299,418 results · 0 filters active
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
4,299,418 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 212 of 85,989

Labels cover 11,048 of 4,299,418 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 4,299,418 of 4,299,418 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundno abstractunlabeled
Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity?
Robert J. Fletcher, Raphaël K. Didham, Jos Barlow, Robert M. Ewers, James Rosindell, Robert D. Holt +10 more
2018· article· en· Biological Conservation· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
725
citations
affunlabeled
Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China
Nan Luo, Gordon Liu, LI Ming-hui, Haijing Guan, Xuejing Jin, Kim Rand
2017· article· en· Value in Health· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
725
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Review of oil spill remote sensing
Merv Fingas, Carl E. Brown
2014· review· en· Marine Pollution Bulletin· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
725
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Sepsis definitions: time for change
Jean‐Louis Vincent, Steven M. Opal, John C. Marshall, Kevin J. Tracey
2013· article· en· The Lancet· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
725
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Arctic Sea Ice in CMIP6
Dirk Notz
2020· article· en· Geophysical Research Letters· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
725
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Vibrational spectroscopy in the electron microscope
Ondrej L. Krivanek, Tracy C. Lovejoy, Niklas Dellby, Toshihiro Aoki, R. W. Carpenter, Peter Rez +6 more
2014· article· en· Nature· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
725
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Greenhouse gas emissions intensity of global croplands
Kimberly M. Carlson, James Gerber, Nathaniel D. Mueller, Mario Herrero, Graham K. MacDonald, Kate A. Brauman +5 more
2016· article· en· Nature Climate Change· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
724
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About