MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,220 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,220 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 23 of 65

Labels cover 4 of 3,220 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,220 of 3,220 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
eROSITA study of the globular cluster 47 Tucanae
Sara Saeedi, Teng Liu, Jonathan Knıes, M. Sasaki, W. Becker, Esra Bülbül +4 more
2022· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
Quark-nova remnants: application to RRATs
Rachid Ouyed, D. A. Leahy, Brian Niebergal
2009· article· en· Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
The MURALES survey
A. Capetti, B. Balmaverde, R. D. Baldi, Stefi A. Baum, M. Chiaberge, P. Grandi +3 more
2023· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
The putative center in NGC 1052
Anne-Kathrin Baczko, M. Kadler, E. Ros, Christian M. Fromm, Maciek Wielgus, M. Perucho +273 more
2024· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Delving into the depths of NGC 3783 with XRISM
M. Audard, Hisamitsu Awaki, Ralf Ballhausen, Aya Bamba, Ehud Behar, Rozenn Boissay-Malaquin +122 more
2025· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Theory of Static Gravitational Field
Jaroslav Hynecek
2012· article· en· Applied Physics Research· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
Emission Modeling in the EHT–ngEHT Age
Richard Anantua, Joaquín Dúran, Nathan Ngata, Lani Oramas, Jan Röder, Razieh Emami +8 more
2022· article· en· Galaxies· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
[no title]
J. W. T. Hessels, B. W. Stappers, Robert E. Rutledge, D. B. Fox, A. H. Shevchuk
2007· article· en· UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
7
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About