MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,819 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,819 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 23 of 57

Labels cover 14 of 2,819 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,819 of 2,819 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Illicit Drug Use and Problem Gambling
Peter Ferentzy, W. J. Skinner, Flora I. Matheson
2013· review· en· ISRN Addiction· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The addictive potential of lottery gambling
Sabine M. Grüsser, Babett Plöntzke, Ulrike Albrecht, Chantal Mörsen
2007· article· en· Journal of Gambling Issues· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The images theory of addiction
Pekka Sulkunen
2015· article· en· The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Problem gambling during Covid-19
Fabio Frisone, Angela Alibrandi, Salvatore Settineri
2020· article· en· DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Tensions and Contentions
Garry J. Smith, Colin Campbell
2007· article· en· American Behavioral Scientist· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Rationality and efficiency in lotto games
Victor A. Matheson, Kent Grote
2005· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Gambling Research and Industry Funding
Peter Collins, Howard J. Shaffer, Robert Ladouceur, Alex Blaszszynski, Davis Fong
2019· article· en· Journal of Gambling Studies· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
14
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Rediscovering the Twelve Steps
Peter Ferentzy, Wayne Skinner, Paul Antze
2006· article· en· Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About