MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,100 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,100 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 23 of 42

Labels cover 193 of 2,100 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,100 of 2,100 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
EPJ Techniques and Instrumention
S J Buckman, Peter Grütter, Martin Hegner
2014· article· en· EPJ Techniques and Instrumentation· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
The Impact Factor and APAQ
Greg Reid, Dale A. Ulrich
2001· article· en· Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
2
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Peer review or barbecue? The choice is clear
Paul C. Hébert
2007· editorial· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Triangulation in Canadian Doctoral Dissertations on Aging
Anna Azulai, James A. Rankin
2012· article· en· International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
2
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Surviving Referees' Reports
Brian Martin
2008· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
The Initial Impact of the Open Scholarship Policy Observatory
Sarah Milligan, Kimberly Silk, Alyssa Arbuckle, Ray Siemens
2019· article· en· KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_scienceconsensus · none
2
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About