MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,326 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,326 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 24 of 27

Labels cover 35 of 1,326 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,326 of 1,326 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Rate in Epidemiology
Monica Nordberg, John H. Duffus, Douglas M. Templeton
2016· dataset· en· IUPAC Standards Online· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Causal Inference for Quantile Treatment Effects
Shuo Sun, Erica E. M. Moodie, Johanna Nešlehová
2021· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Occurrence Download
2024· dataset· en· Global Biodiversity Information Facility· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affunlabeled
Causality/Causation
Carl V. Phillips, Karen J. Goodman
2008· other· en· Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Panel Discussion 1
SA Sutcliffe, Gary Deng, L S Wright, JaneMaree Maher, Sarang Thiruvoth Sagar
2008· article· en· Current Oncology· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Panel Discussion 3
Barbara Bell, Terry Sullivan, M. Vachon, Pamela Catton, AlejandroR. Jadad, L. Morrison
2008· article· en· Current Oncology· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Detailed Treatment Plan
Marie‐Christine Ouellet, Simon Beaulieu‐Bonneau, Josée Savard, Charles M. Morin
2019· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Promises of Parallel Outcomes
Ying Zhou, Dehan Kong, Linbo Wang
2020· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Causal inference under directed acyclic graphs
Yuan Wang
2015· dissertation· en· Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Comment on Gopez et al.
Yvan C. Bédard, Rita A. Kandel
2002· article· en· Diagnostic Cytopathology· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Commentary on Cox et al.
Sue Murphy
2019· article· en· Evidence-Based Mental Health· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
IV Methods for Tobit Models
Andrew Chesher, Dongwoo Kim
2022· report· en· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Effect Modification in Cohort Studies
Stephen C. Newman
2023· book-chapter· en· Epidemiologic Methods· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
<scp>G</scp>‐Estimation
Erica E. M. Moodie, David A. Stephens, Michael P. Wallace
2017· other· en· Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Dynamic Treatment Regimes on Dyadic Networks
Marizeh Mussavi Rizi, Joel A. Dubin, Michael Wallace
2024· article· en· Statistics in Medicine· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Individual Fairness
Arthur Charpentier
2024· book-chapter· ca· Springer Actuarial· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About