Bibliographic record
Abstract
A dataset containing 10087 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "and" : [ "BasisOfRecord is one of (Observation, Human Observation, Material citation, Specimen, Machine Observation, Material sample, Fossil, Living Specimen, Occurrence evidence)", "Continent is one of (North America, Asia, Europe, Africa, Antarctica, South America, Oceania)", "Country is one of (Philippines, United States of America, Indonesia)", "DatasetKey is one of (EOD – eBird Observation Dataset, Vertebrate Zoology Division - Ornithology, Yale Peabody Museum, iNaturalist Research-grade Observations, The MOBIOS+: A FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) Database for Mindanao's Terrestrial Biodiversity, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Division of Birds, Ornithology Collection Non Passeriformes - Royal Ontario Museum, KUBI Ornithology Collection, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, The birds collection (ZO) of the Muséum national d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN - Paris), NHMD Ornithology Collection, University of the Philippines Los Baños Museum of Natural History Dioscoro Rabor Collection: Luzon Birds, Xeno-canto - Bird sounds from around the world, Field Museum of Natural History (Zoology) Bird Collection, MVZ Bird Collection (Arctos), DMNS Bird Collection (Arctos), Macaulay Library Audio and Video Collection, Observation.org, Nature data from around the World, Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL) - Aves, NMNH Extant Specimen Records (USNM, US), UWBM Ornithology Collection, LACM Vertebrate Collection, INSDC Sequences, International Barcode of Life project (iBOL), RBINS Bird collection, RBINS DaRWIN, UAZ Bird Collection)", "HasCoordinate is true", "HasGeospatialIssue is false", "OccurrenceStatus is Present", "PublishingOrg is one of (e2e717bf-551a-4917-bdc9-4fa0f342c530, 2e167bb0-4441-11db-9ba2-b8a03c50a862, 28eb1a3f-1c15-4a95-931a-4af90ecb574d, 750a8724-fa66-4c27-b645-bd58ac5ee010, 6ea87510-0561-11d8-b851-b8a03c50a862, ff418020-1d67-11d9-8435-b8a03c50a862, b554c320-0560-11d8-b851-b8a03c50a862, 2cd829bb-b713-433d-99cf-64bef11e5b3e, 2e7df380-8356-4533-bcb3-5459e23c794e, b4640710-8e03-11d8-b956-b8a03c50a862)", "TaxonKey is one of (Loriculus philippensis (Statius Muller, 1776), Loriculus philippensis mindorensis Steere, 1890, Loriculus philippensis bournsi McGregor, 1905, Loriculus philippensis regulus Souance, 1856, Loriculus philippensis worcesteri Steere, 1890, Loriculus philippensis philippensis, Loriculus philippensis apicalis Souance, 1856, Loriculus philippensis siquijorensis Steere, 1890, Loriculus philippensis bonapartei Souance, 1856, Loriculus philippensis dohertyi Hartert, 1906, Loriculus philippensis chrysonotus P.L.Sclater, 1872, Loriculus camiguinensis Tello, Degner, J.M.Bates & Willard, 2006)", "Year 1000-2024" ] } The dataset includes 10087 records from 11 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0024399-240626123714530/datasets/export for details. Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.342 | 0.408 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".