MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,360 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,360 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 24 of 28

Labels cover 12 of 1,360 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,360 of 1,360 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Reread
Elizabeth Bernstein
2012· article· en· ˜The œjournal of ecocriticism· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Bringing Presence to the Past
Pam Fairfield
2009· article· en· BCLA Browser: Linking the Library Landscape· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Digitally Endangered Species: The BitList
Sarah Middleton, William Kilbride
2018· article· en· KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
[Archivos in Vancouver and Brasilia].
Norma Rossato
2009· editorial· es· PubMed· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Mobile Archivists: Outreach on the Go!
Catherine Hannula, Jennifer Barth
2018· article· en· KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Assessing the loss of Western Canadian digital heritage
Tasbire Saiyera, Brenda Reyes Ayala, Qiufeng Du
2021· article· en· Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Resurrecting a dead manuscript: Tales from the crypt
Carrie B. Scherzer, Jeremy Trenchuk, Meaghan Peters, Robert Mazury
2023· article· en· International Journal for Students as Partners· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
CAML 2015 Annual Report: RILM Canada
Sean Luyk
2015· article· fr· CAML Review / Revue de l ACBM· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
E-Archiving for Posterity
2003· article· en· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Preserving Digital Materials
Kapena Shim
2010· article· en· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Feminisms in the Archives
Danielle Allard, Tami Oliphant, Thane Chambers
2025· article· en· Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Integrity Management
Amin Ranj Bar, Muthucumaru Maheswaran
2013· book-chapter· en· SpringerBriefs in applied sciences and technology· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
DSpace as a Preservation Platform
Mark Jordan
2005· article· en· Investigative ophthalmology· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Introduction
Andrew Prescott, Alison Wiggins
2023· book-chapter· en· Archives· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Winnipeg 1995.tab
Unav
2008· dataset· en· Harvard Dataverse· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Vancouver_TV 1993.tab
Unav
2008· dataset· fr· Harvard Dataverse· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Curating print collections in the digital age
Sean Swanick, Jennifer Garland
2014· article· en· Collection Building· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Perspectives: Imperial Extraction on Display
Lijuan Xu, Mónica M. Salas Landa
2024· article· en· Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About