Bibliographic record
Abstract
Library and Archives Canada (lac) continues to acquire and make available archival records from Canadian labour unions and prominent Canadian labour leaders and activists.This report highlights the notable additions of private archives to the lac labour collection in the last few years.These new additions are more than 120 metres of textual records.Private archival records are an invaluable resource.These archival documents are records of the regular activities, transactions and operations of people, families, and organizations.Unlike published materials, which are available in multiple copies, there is only one copy of archival documents, making archival documents unique records of the past.Also, unlike published materials, which have been created and edited for a large public audience, archival documents are created only for the people who will be working with those documents.Private archives are a rich source for researchers and the public who use these documents in academic research, fiction, documentaries, feature films and genealogy, among other uses.lac and other archival institutions rely on the donation of records of the public to create a corpus of records that documents Canada and is representative of all Canadians.All of the archival fonds mentioned in this report are available for public consultation, subject to access restrictions.These records have been arranged and described and finding aids and online descriptive records have been created.For further details, please contact lac Reference Services 1 and/or the lac online catalogue.2 The report is structured as follows: newly available personal fonds will be presented, followed by newly available union fonds.The report will conclude 1. "Services for the Public," Library and Archives Canada, last modified 11 January 2022, https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/services-public/Pages/services-public.aspx. "Collection Search," Library and
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.021 | 0.046 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.083 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".