MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Nuclear physics research studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,822 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,822 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 24 of 37

Labels cover 0 of 1,822 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,822 of 1,822 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
The SPICE Detector at ISAC
A. B. Garnsworthy, M. Moukaddam, C. T. Bolton, S. Ketelhut, L. J. Evitts, C. Andreoiu +4 more
2013· article· en· EPJ Web of Conferences· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Capture rates of highly degenerate neutrons
Bryn Knight, O L Caballero, H. Schatz
2024· article· en· Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Neutron matter at the interface(s)
Mateusz Buraczynski, Nawar Ismail, Alexandros Gezerlis
2020· article· en· The European Physical Journal A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Modern topics in theoretical nuclear physics
B.K. Jennings, A. Schwenk
2007· article· en· Canadian Journal of Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Sensitivity Increases for the TITAN Decay Spectroscopy Program
K. G. Leach, A. Lennarz, A. Grossheim, C. Andreoiu, J. Dilling, D. Frekers +2 more
2015· article· en· Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
TACTIC – Ion tracking in nuclear physics
L. Martin, G. Ruprecht, U. Hager, L. Buchmann, P. Amaudruz, S. P. Fox +8 more
2010· article· en· Journal of Physics Conference Series· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
THE PION FORM FACTOR
H. P. Blok, G. M. Huber, D. Mack
2002· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
How well do we understand the reaction rate of C burning?
S. Courtin, C. L. Jiang, G. Fruet, K. Auranen, M. L. Avila, A. D. Ayangeakaa +36 more
2017· article· en· EPJ Web of Conferences· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About