MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,560 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,560 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 24 of 32

Labels cover 4 of 1,560 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,560 of 1,560 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Quantum gravity
Elia Sinaiko
2019· article· en· Physics Essays· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
CAN WE TEST QUANTUM FIELD THEORY ON MARS?
A.J. Brown, P. Pinet, E. A. Cloutis, A. M. Zastrow, T. S. J. Gabriel
2024· article· en· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Applied physics-I: Introduction to neurophysics
Reza Khanbabaie, M Tabesh
2016· article· en· DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Section 11. From Quantum
Ross Honsberger
2019· book-chapter· en· American Mathematical Society eBooks· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
On the notion of quantum Lyapunov exponent
Margo Kondratieva, T. A. Osborn
2008· article· en· Journal of Mathematical Sciences· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Specific Quantity
2010· other· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
An operator-valued Lyapunov theorem
Sarah Plosker, Christopher Ramsey
2018· preprint· en· Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Towards Photonic Hybrid Entanglement
Félix Bussières, Allison Rubenok, Nicolas Godbout, Wolfgang Tittel
2007· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About