MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,941 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,941 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 26 of 59

Labels cover 3 of 2,941 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,941 of 2,941 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Amusia and Cognitive Deficits after Stroke
Teppo Särkämö, Mari Tervaniemi, Seppo Soinila, Taina Autti, Heli Silvennoinen, Matti Laine +1 more
2009· article· en· Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Spontaneous Production Rates in Music and Speech
Peter Q. Pfordresher, Emma B. Greenspon, A. L. Friedman, Caroline Palmėr
2021· article· en· Frontiers in Psychology· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
Break Expectancy in Duration Discrimination.
Sébastien Tremblay, Claudette Fortin
2003· article· en· Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Improved tactile frequency discrimination in musicians
Andréanne Sharp, Marie-Soleil Houde, Maxime Maheu, Issah Ibrahim, François Champoux
2019· article· en· Experimental Brain Research· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Time, Place and Content
Jonathon D. Crystal
2006· article· en· Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
afffundunlabeled
Upper limits of auditory rotational motion perception
François‐Xavier Féron, Ilja Frissen, Julien Boissinot, Catherine Guastavino
2010· article· en· The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affunlabeled
Gender differences in the temporal voice areas
Merle-Marie Ahrens, Bashar Hasan, Bruno L. Giordano, Pascal Belin
2014· article· en· Frontiers in Neuroscience· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affunlabeled
Fast temporal interactions in human auditory cortex
André Rupp, Sebastian Hack, Alexander Gutschalk, Peter Schneider, Terence W. Picton, Christoph Stippich +1 more
2000· article· en· Neuroreport· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About