MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,079 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,079 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 26 of 42

Labels cover 5 of 2,079 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,079 of 2,079 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
Preheating in an asymptotically safe quantum field theory
Ole Svendsen, Hossein Bazrafshan Moghaddam, Robert Brandenberger
2016· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Ring wormholes and time machines
Valeri P. Frolov, Pavel Krtouš, Andrei Zelnikov
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Constraints on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> gravity from thermal-Sunyaev-Zel’dovich-effect-selected SPT galaxy clusters and weak lensing mass calibration from DES and HST
Sophie M. L. Vogt, S. Bocquet, C. T. Davies, J. J. Mohr, Fabian Schmidt, Cheng-Zong Ruan +47 more
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Collapse and bounce of null fluids
Bradley Creelman, Ivan Booth
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Time travel paradoxes and multiple histories
Jacob Hauser, Barak Shoshany
2020· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Parametrized path approach to vacuum decay
Florent Michel
2020· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Mixmaster dynamics in the dust time gauge
Masooma Ali, Viqar Husain
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
A generalized uncertainty-inspired quantum black hole
Federica Fragomeno, D. M. Gingrich, Samantha Hergott, Saeed Rastgoo, Evan Vienneau
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Entanglement harvesting: State dependence and covariance
Héctor Maeso-García, José Polo-Gómez, Eduardo Martín-Martínez
2022· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Supernova pointing capabilities of DUNE
A. Abed Abud, B. Abi, R. Acciarri, M. A. Acero, M. R. Adames, G. Adamov +1339 more
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Conformally coupled scalar in rotating black hole spacetimes
Finnian Gray, Ian Holst, David Kubizňák, Gloria Odak, Dalila Pîrvu, T. Rick Perche
2020· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
CMB spectral distortions from cooling macroscopic dark matter
Saurabh Kumar, Emanuela Dimastrogiovanni, Glenn D. Starkman, Craig J. Copi, Bryan K. Lynn
2019· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About