MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,907 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,907 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 27 of 39

Labels cover 5 of 1,907 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,907 of 1,907 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s0000-0000(07)46851-6
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s0029-7437(09)70237-x
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
THE NEW ABORTION LEGISLATION
Sheilah L. Martin
2011· article· en· Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Myth of IVF
Heidi Barkun
2019· article· en· Continent· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reproductive Rights in Affluent Nations
Roxanne Mykitiuk, Robyn Lee
2015· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Alain Roy, Droit de l'adoption
Sarah Geneviève
2012· article· fr· Revue générale de droit· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Medicalisation
2015· other· en· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s1047-9422(02)00032-9
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affaboutno abstractunlabeled
Accreditation of Reproductive Medicine in Canada
John Jarrell, Arthur Leader, Marie Claude Léveillé, Salim Daya, Susan Ward, Roger A. Pierson +3 more
2000· article· en· Journal SOGC· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About