MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,079 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,079 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 27 of 42

Labels cover 5 of 2,079 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,079 of 2,079 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Fractal dimension of turbulent black holes
John Ryan Westernacher-Schneider
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Gravitational collapse in scale-dependent gravity
Ramin Hassannejad, Gaetano Lambiase, Fabio Scardigli, Fatimah Shojai
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Axion quality and fifth force
Yue Zhang
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Entanglement from rotating black holes in thermal baths
Iván Agulló, Anthony J. Brady, Adrià Delhom, Dimitrios Kranas
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Measurement of the multineutron <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math> charged current differential cross section at low available energy on hydrocarbon
A. Olivier, T. Cai, S. Akhter, Z. Ahmad Dar, V. Ansari, M. V. Ascencio +55 more
2023· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Search for gravitational wave signals from known pulsars in LIGO-Virgo O3 data using the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>-vector ensemble method
L. D’Onofrio, R. De Rosa, C. Palomba, P. Leaci, O. J. Piccinni, V. Sequino +13 more
2023· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Phases of nonsupersymmetric gauge theories: The <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math> case study
Csaba Csáki, Andrew Gomes, Hitoshi Murayama, Ofri Telem
2021· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Deformations of extremal black holes and the UV
Calvin Y.-R. Chen, Claudia de Rham, Andrew J. Tolley
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
More excitement across the horizon
María R. Preciado-Rivas, Manar Naeem, Robert B. Mann, Jorma Louko
2024· preprint· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Cosmic ray-boosted dark matter at IceCube
Christopher V. Cappiello, Qinrui Liu, Gopolang Mohlabeng, Aaron C. Vincent
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Model-independent description of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mi>π</mml:mi> <mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> decays
Erik Gustafson, Florian Herren, R. S. Van de Water, R. van Tonder, Michael L. Wagman
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Measurements of the temperature and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi> </mml:math> -mode polarization of the cosmic microwave background from the full 500-square-degree SPTpol dataset
T.-L. Chou, P. A. R. Ade, A. J. Anderson, Jason E. Austermann, L. Balkenhol, James A. Beall +56 more
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Black hole explosions as probes of new physics
Kevin Federico, Stefano Profumo
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 gravitational lensing and SDSS BOSS cross-correlation measurement and constraints on gravity with the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> statistic
Lukas Wenzl, Rui An, Nicholas Battaglia, Rachel Bean, Erminia Calabrese, Shi-Fan Chen +21 more
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Baryogenesis and dark matter in multiple hidden sectors
Hassan Easa, Thomas Grégoire, Daniel Stolarski, Catarina Cosme
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About