MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 29 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Quantum radiation from a sandwich black hole
Valeri P. Frolov, Andrei Zelnikov
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affunlabeled
Brane-antibrane systems and the thermal life of neutral black holes
Omid Saremi, Amanda W. Peet
2004· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
afffundunlabeled
Dynamical Response near Quantum Critical Points
Andrew Lucas, Snir Gazit, Daniel K. Podolsky, William Witczak‐Krempa
2017· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Bulk axions, brane back-reaction and fluxes
C. P. Burgess, Leo van Nierop
2011· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affunlabeled
Holography of information in de Sitter space
Tuneer Chakraborty, Joydeep Chakravarty, Victor Godet, Priyadarshi Paul, Suvrat Raju
2023· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Holographic and QFT complexity with angular momentum
Alice Bernamonti, Francesco Bigazzi, Davide Billo, Lapo Faggi, Federico Galli
2021· article· en· Florence Research (University of Florence)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
afffundunlabeled
χ-systems for correlation functions
João Caetano, Jonathan Toledo
2019· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
afffundunlabeled
(0,4) brane box models
2019· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Nutty Bubbles
A. M. Ghezelbash, Robert B. Mann
2002· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affunlabeled
Linear Sigma Models of H and KK Monopoles
2005· article· en· CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
D-terms on the resolved conifold
Keshav Dasgupta, Paul Franche, Anke Knauf, James Sully
2009· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affunlabeled
Multitrace deformation of the Aharony-Bergman-Jafferis-Maldacena theory
Ben Craps, Thomas Hertog, Neil Turok
2009· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
affunlabeled
Apparent horizon in fluid-gravity duality
Ivan Booth, Michał P. Heller, Grzegorz Plewa, Michał Spaliński
2011· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
affunlabeled
Apparent horizon formation in the head-on collision of gyratons
Hirotaka Yoshino, Andrei Zelnikov, Valeri P. Frolov
2007· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About